“The government seems very interested in having a dialogue with Boko Haram, perhaps realising a military response alone is inadequate.”
A ceasefire agreement with the jihadist group Boko Haram has been in effect for the past three months and is expected to be extended, but has not been previously reported publicly, The New Humanitarian has learned.
The agreement is linked to hostage negotiations that secured the release in June of 360 civilians abducted by the group from Ngoshe village, in the foothills of the Mandara mountains on the border with Cameroon. The mass kidnapping occurred in March during a Boko Haram attack on a nearby army base.
Three people with contacts among Boko Haram members, some of them senior figures, independently told The New Humanitarian that a truce had been in effect since June and was likely to be extended for a further 40 days. Communities in the Ngoshe area – regular victims of Boko Haram predation – say attacks have stopped since the ceasefire, according to two of the sources.
The deal that freed the villagers also reportedly included a ransom payment of five billion naira ($3.7 million) by the government, a transaction Abuja has denied amid controversy over the alleged misappropriation of some of the money.
The New Humanitarian reached out to spokespeople for the government, defence headquarters, and the army to verify reports of a ceasefire, but received no reply prior to publishing.
What remains unclear is the longer-term significance of any agreement. “It could be just a temporary, tactical ceasefire that benefits both sides, but doesn’t really affect the trajectory of the war,” said conflict researcher Malik Samuel. “I don’t think it’s a step towards a sustainable peace settlement.”
The deal does not involve so-called Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), an offshoot and rival to Boko Haram, based on the islands of Lake Chad and a rural swathe of northeastern Borno State. Clashes have continued between the two groups.
After 17 years of a war that has indirectly cost close to 350,000 civilian lives, the idea of negotiations with Boko Haram – officially Jama’at Ahl al Sunna li Da’wa wal Jihad (JAS) – and other armed groups sharply divides Nigerians. Those living closest to the conflict tend to be far more supportive of dialogue than the rest of the country.
How Nigeria is reintegrating repentant former Boko Haram fighters
However, the government’s public position is an emphatic rejection of talks with a group legally proscribed as a terrorist organisation.
President Bola Tinubu has instead announced the beefing up of an overstretched army – an initiative related to elections early next year in which public safety will be a key issue. The promised 30,000 new recruits and four extra divisions will provide the “teeth that are needed to defeat terrorism and banditry”, Tinubu said in July.
Nevertheless, behind the scenes, “the government seems very interested in having a dialogue with Boko Haram, perhaps realising a military response alone is inadequate to resolving the problem,” noted Samuel.





